loading...

MGT502 Assignment No 2 Spring 2012 solution

Communication and technology

Mr. Usman was very happy to introduce an effective and easy to use communication tool in his department. His department consisted of almost 90 employees. Through this system all employees, managers and supervisors as well as customers and suppliers could be connected to each other. This tool, known as “C-kype”, included different features through which people could contribute by sharing different types of data, information or private messages. This system was quickly accepted by the employees as it made communication easy and convenient.
Among different uses of this tool, the most prominent was “team innovators”, a professionals’ conference that allow 30 professionals of the department to share information or discuss any new or creative idea. A message posted on this conference was automatically sent to 30 professionals. Messages posted ranged from request for information, instructions regarding task allocation or completion, changes in ongoing processes and discussions on different policies of organization.
On average 100 to 150 messages were posted in a day. Each message came with a beep and a red flag on receivers desktop. Less than half of these messages conveyed meaningful information. General messages came from employees’ side were “OK”, “I agree”, “done”, “communicated” etc. These messages irritated some employees as continuous beeping diverted their attention from their current task.
Moreover discussion on controversial issues sometimes led towards misunderstandings and personal attacks that created tense environment in office. Employees started using it for personal messages even people posted messages to a person sitting next to him that can easily be done in face-to-face conversation. Employees who requested to maintain professional tone were had to face criticism.
This tool was losing its main purpose as no such creativity was enhanced after its installation. Mr. Usman was asked to intervene. But he was reluctant to take back his decision as it was very effective tool of communication.
After three months it was found that the number of messages posted on C-kype had decreased to 20% a day. It was also found that people still gave two to three words acknowledgments but most of the employees just read messages without responding.
In a recent discussion Mr. Awais a professional employee presented an idea to change work procedures on “team innovators”. He was considered a controversial personality as he was involved in many personal attacks on others. His idea was immediately welcomed by three of his colleagues who praised his creativity and initiative. One other employee suggested that the idea given by Mr. Awais should be discussed face-to-face, but she was immediately shouted down by accusing her of being a blocker of innovation. Other 20 or more professional never commented on C-kype rather they discussed that idea in lunch breaks. After two weeks Mr. Awais took the proposal to Mr. Usman for implementation. Mr. Usman noted that “team innovator” had a chance to discuss this idea and could refine it through that conference but they did not.

Question

1. What do you think, should Mr. Usman implement the proposal of Mr. Awais? Give logical reasoning to support your answer. (15 marks)

2. After analyzing the whole situation Mr. Usman has found that people are reluctant in giving their feedback on the discussions opened through C-kype. Suggest some ways through which he can improve the communication and participation of employee on C-kype. (15 marks)

SOLUTION IDEA

Some companies elevate teamwork, while others think it is more of a hindrance to productivity, but there are distinct advantages and disadvantages of collaboration in the workplace.

 

Image: Francesco Marino / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Workplace collaboration can be an instrumental part of the decision-making process within an organization, but this tool needs to be properly implemented to maximize its benefits and downplay potential negatives. A discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of collaboration in the workplace follows.

What are the Advantages of Collaboration in the Workplace?

There are several possible benefits to workplace collaboration.

  1. The Collaborative Process Combines Different Perspectives. When individuals from various professional and technical backgrounds come together to work on a project, the result is that all angles are considered. This is a particularly attractive outcome, especially in situations where the project is expected to command a huge budget, because it eliminates the possibility of errors arising out failures and considers the effect of contributing elements.
  2. Workplace Collaboration Encourages Creativity. Bringing together several different voices from within an organization helps to raise the profile of ideas that may never have come to the forefront if not for the collaborative effort. Teams that are well-structured consist of staff members from various levels of the company and these individuals naturally bring with them their outlook on the project. Creative solutions are often the result of simply looking at challenges from a different angle.
  3. Collaboration Takes Advantage of Synergies. The formation of a collaborative teams often involves the separation of duties. Within the structure of the team, certain members may be asked to focus on particular elements and put forth a recommendation based on their expertise. This kind of separation of responsibilities helps to bring the benefit of synergy to the project because areas of overlap are more easily identified and the incidences of re-doing work can be eliminated.
  4. Workplace Collaboration Brings Balance to Decision Making. The influence of several different stakeholders that may comprise the overall team helps to ensure that the decisions made are ones that consider the effect of all the interested parties. This means that workplace collaboration can root out the occurrence of biased or partisan decisions because each stakeholder has a presence around the table.
  5. Collaboration May Improve Delivery Times. If the stakeholders are able to recognize their synergies and leverage the experience of all the parties represented, a project that is a collaborative effort has the potential to be completed on or even before schedule.

What are the Disadvantages of Collaboration in the Workplace?

Despite these benefits there are also several disadvantages of collaboration in the workplace. Some of them are listed below.

  1. The Incidence of Group Think. While bringing different stakeholders together for the common good can introduce various new perspectives to the dynamic of the discussion, there is also the looming threat of group think. This occurs when the stronger personalities are so persuasive that they manage to take over the discussion and supplant their ideas as the outcome for the group.
  2. Possible Ambiguity in Roles and Responsibility. If the responsibilities of the different stakeholders are not clearly defined their contribution may fall into ambiguity and the result can only be chaos. Ambiguity is particularly common in collaborative groups that are extremely large. The benefit of having several different perspectives starts to decline after an optimum number of members is crossed and this number may vary from project to project.
  3. The Cost of Collaboration May Be High. Although advancements in technology make it possible for collaborative efforts to cross international barriers and even time zones, the cost of doing this must be factored into the equation. The larger the number of individuals involved in the collaborative effort the greater the cost of the exercise in terms of directly facilitating meetings and indirectly because of the time spent away from their other duties.
  4. Collaboration Often Leads to Longer Decision Times. Quite simply, when more people need to be consulted before a decision can be made, the project lead times are extended to facilitate this extra consultation.
  5. Conflict Within the Group. When team members are constantly at crossroads over key points, the project suffers. Personality clashes have a lot to do with the ability to come to an agreement and if the chosen individuals are not able to communicate effectively, the overall project objectives will not be met.

Conclusion

Although their are advantages and disadvantages of collaboration in the workplace, the effective use of collaboration in the workplace is dependent on the recognition of possible problems and a conscious effort to eradicate them, so the many benefits can be exploited.

DOWNLOAD SOLUTION HERE
loading...